Beastiality. Its disgusting. Sorry, it just is. Now that’s out of the way, I can tell you the story. A judge in the US has been forced to suspend a trial he was presiding over due to the fact that he is just as bad as the person being prosecuted
The defendant in the case in question is appearing on charges of obscenity relating to porn he supposedly produces, basically containing such delights as beastiality and scat porn. The problem is, the judge himself has been found with images of a sexual nature on his own website.
Those images consist of women painted up like cows (yes, cows) on all fours, along with a semi naked man and a horny farmyard critter – delightful!
He has tried to explain it though (as if he wouldn’t try to save his arse, he IS a judge after all). One explanation was that ‘my son did it’ while another was a bit more weird: that he didn’t know the pictures were publically accessible and that they were intended for sharing with a few friends. Now, the first excuse he gave is probably just one of those finger-pointing exercises, but the second one is just odd. Does he think that gets him off the hook, or makes it sound any better? Or that, in fact, it makes a blind bit of difference?
Nevertheless, he has been forced to suspend the trial while the prosecution lawyers work out if they are likely to get a good conviction against the defendant when the judge is into that kind of weird stuff too.
Oh, and the defendant’s excuse for his own production of such timeless classics as ‘Gang Bang Horse – Pony Sex Game’ and ‘Hollywood Scat Amateurs #7′? That his porn is in fact ’serious art’ and that, like 2girls1cup (which if you haven’t seen you haven’t lived), is designed to shock the audience rather than give them a sexual thrill. Ah well, times like these you realise how weird the world is…
Things I like:| wooshii online video advertising |
| professional video production |
Leave a reply